Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2011 0:42:55 GMT -1
However there is a common view on te treatment and protection of children which should be enforced! There is? Maybe somebody should tell Judge Peter Fox QC, because he seems to not be quite up to speed on that.. He that let the guy in possession of truly horrific child abuse content to go free. He that declared a 13 year old was 'at fault' not the adult man who incited her. But hey, here in the UKE we seem to have more regard for the welfare of animals than we do children.  |
|
|
|
Post by ozneil on Apr 9, 2011 2:52:58 GMT -1
However there is a common view on te treatment and protection of children which should be enforced! There is? Maybe somebody should tell Judge Peter Fox QC, because he seems to not be quite up to speed on that.. He that let the guy in possession of truly horrific child abuse content to go free. He that declared a 13 year old was 'at fault' not the adult man who incited her. But hey, here in the UKE we seem to have more regard for the welfare of animals than we do children. Yeah we have noticed the Royal in RSPCA which is missing in the SPCC |
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Apr 9, 2011 7:11:30 GMT -1
There is? Maybe somebody should tell Judge Peter Fox QC, because he seems to not be quite up to speed on that.. He that let the guy in possession of truly horrific child abuse content to go free. He that declared a 13 year old was 'at fault' not the adult man who incited her. But hey, here in the UKE we seem to have more regard for the welfare of animals than we do children. Yeah we have noticed the Royal in RSPCA which is missing in the SPCC Sorry Oz no quite teh case RSPCC - Royal Society for the prevention of cruelty tae children -a purely scottish based charity now known as Children firstNSPCC - engerlish equivalent SSPCA - Scottish Society for the Prevention of cruelty to animalsRSPCA - engerlish equivalents (thievin basturds that they are) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2011 18:26:13 GMT -1
Just going back to this case from the West End a month ago, a man has been arrested this week. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-12750452Strathclyde Police set up a specific unit last month to deal with the spate of violent rapes and already arrested two teenagers on the Renfield Lane attack, now this. Good, these fuckwit dangerous guys need to get the message loud and clear that they WILL be hunted down. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2011 22:36:54 GMT -1
A 13 year old girl attacked in Manchester at 3.30pm, walking home from school. Here follow the wise warnings of Manchester's finest; "Supt Stuart Barton of Greater Manchester Police said: 'This a particularly harrowing investigation. No one should be subject to a sexual assault, let alone a girl of that age and walking home from school in the afternoon. 'My advise would be this: if you're walking home from school, make sure your parents know where you are and make sure you don't walk around at night on your own.'(The girl walked that route every day. Her parents would have known that. So what difference would THAT have made to the crime?)
Mr Barton added: ''She was walking across a path she normally takes and is not an isolated route. It's a common footpath for the public to use, it's an open piece of grass. ' We are going to do some work with school pupils to raise awareness of the dangers of walking home alone.What planet is Superintendent Barton ON? Do all parents pick up all kids from school in his fantasy world? Are they negligent if they don't? Are kids who don't happen to have friends walking their way negligent of their own safety as well? HOW ABOUT YOU SEND A MESSAGE TO THE RAPIST, SUPERINTENDENT BARTON. He must be quaking in his boots today- NOT. Don't start me. |
|
