Another Coverup??

[bormes]

Today two men found guilty of sex abuse have hugely different sentences.
One, a young man who raped a child of three years old was sentenced to eight years, where he can be out of prison in four!!
Another man, Gary Glitter was sentenced to sixteen years and he is into his seventies, he may never get out of prison alive, GOOD.
However, I can not help but wonder either WHO or WHAT this other scumbag knew or knows that got him such a MINOR sentence for such a horrific sentence?
A lot of these monsters share children and information and that really has me wondering why he is being protected from a serious justified sentence?
Thomas Hamilton immediately comes to mind and that fat fuck Robertson who became NATO Envoy until the USA TOLD the UK Government to GET RID of him or would publicise what he was up to with Thomas Hamilton and others, wee sleekit Forsythe for example.
Just as they have today by blowing jihady john's real name.
Our security services have know for months who this psycho was but would not name him.

[ozneil]

Not only in UK!happens everywhere. With a competent unbiased press a lot more would be exposed!

[bormes]

Yes Oz,
Unfortunately the Net seems to be where a lot of UNREPORTED stuff shows up.
Like for example the truth about Scotland and the SNP!!!!
The BBC have no longer the trust that they had earned during and after WW2 !!

[ozneil]

Feb 27, 2015 21:49:15 GMT -1 bormes said:

Yes Oz,
Unfortunately the Net seems to be where a lot of UNREPORTED stuff shows up.
Like for example the truth about Scotland and the SNP!!!!
The BBC have no longer the trust that they had earned during and after WW2 !!

Nor does ABC Now known in some quarters as the ALPBC (Australian Labour Party Broadcasting Commission)

[Deleted]

Feb 27, 2015 17:22:43 GMT -1 bormes said:

Today two men found guilty of sex abuse have hugely different sentences.
One, a young man who raped a child of three years old was sentenced to eight years, where he can be out of prison in four!!
Another man, Gary Glitter was sentenced to sixteen years and he is into his seventies, he may never get out of prison alive, GOOD.
However, I can not help but wonder either WHO or WHAT this other scumbag knew or knows that got him such a MINOR sentence for such a horrific sentence?
A lot of these monsters share children and information and that really has me wondering why he is being protected from a serious justified sentence?
Thomas Hamilton immediately comes to mind and that fat fuck Robertson who became NATO Envoy until the USA TOLD the UK Government to GET RID of him or would publicise what he was up to with Thomas Hamilton and others, wee sleekit Forsythe for example.
Just as they have today by blowing jihady john's real name.
Our security services have know for months who this psycho was but would not name him.

Bormes, I was going to start a thread on this too, but I just felt kinda defeated and yes, upset, by it all.

I simply CAN NOT believe that the guy who raped a three year old boy at nursery, and was also found guilty of abuse of a young teenage girl PLUS another charge found unproven...only got eight years: as you say, out in four.

Paul Gadd (Glitter) will spend the rest of his life in jail. A serial offender.

BUT Guy One, the nursery worker, SHIRLEY has potential to become a serial offender too- in fact, he already IS!

He'll be out in four, and on some "register" or another but won't be rehab'd (if that's even POSSIBLE) in jail. That is part of the problem.

So there HAS to be a case where paedo rapists' rights become WAY secondary to protecting babies and children i.e keep them locked away until we can be certain they're rehab'd.

And as you rightly say, the British establishment is rotten to the core: and ranks closed to protect the guilty until they've died-- at the earliest.