|
Post by minime on Sept 10, 2014 6:20:52 GMT -1
Re Oz's post, I'm sure a quick trawl of the internet will find all sorts of theories and hatred stoking messages.
Immigration - shudder.
Muslim - eek!
Prisoners - scary.
Controls - no!!
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Sept 10, 2014 16:23:18 GMT -1
sorry fanniebawz I think you'll find that it was you who "butted in" to the thread - we were already there now away ye go and have a wee drinky-poo - ye know ye want to If you bothered to see beyond your wee tartan mist, I actually made a valid point. If someone is going to set something out then it helps when the source is given. Clearly B raided his favourite newspaper to stoke his fears and prejudices. But rather than let him respond you just fly in with your insults (and you keep them coming. Sad really. go on have a drink, you know you want to - jist the wan............... I didn't "fly in" I spent nearly 4 minutes contemplating it, which is 10 minutes more time than a complete fekked up erse like you require. Best you crawl back under whichever stone you emerged from wae yer bottle, we find your drunken stupors bliss
|
|
|
Post by minime on Sept 10, 2014 19:24:50 GMT -1
If you bothered to see beyond your wee tartan mist, I actually made a valid point. If someone is going to set something out then it helps when the source is given. Clearly B raided his favourite newspaper to stoke his fears and prejudices. But rather than let him respond you just fly in with your insults (and you keep them coming. Sad really. go on have a drink, you know you want to - jist the wan............... I didn't "fly in" I spent nearly 4 minutes contemplating it, which is 10 minutes more time than a complete fekked up erse like you require. Best you crawl back under whichever stone you emerged from wae yer bottle, we find your drunken stupors bliss What's this obsession with drink? Is it your simple-minded way to dismiss someone you've taken a dislike to? I guess by doing that it means you don't have to respond in any meaningful way. Also it could be classed as bullying and I think I'm right to say bullies are usually pathetic and insecure and they bully to give themselves a bit of (false) self-worth. But you continue to show yourself up. I'm sure others will have their own thoughts about the way you conduct yourself.
|
|
|
Post by minime on Sept 10, 2014 19:28:15 GMT -1
But back on topic.
It looks like Bormes' rant was based on a rubbish report which lit his blue touch paper of prejudice and hate.
Unless he bothers to show us something different.
|
|
|
Post by ozneil on Sept 10, 2014 20:00:45 GMT -1
gee Nota so in the question I pasted the writers spelled Qatar incorrectly whooopydoo
When I read the question alarm bells rang... Its a typical "courtroom" "trap" question so I re-read it several times but Nota galloped in with his little red flag flying to show how silly the question was or how clever he was take your pick.
Whoever wrote that question knew exactly what he wanted from the questionee. Whether he got it or not I "dinna ken"
If it had been done in court I can just see my favourite barrister (advocate) standing up at his lectern adjusting his wig looking at his notes then saying in a slow very pleasant drewl. "That was very interesting Mr Nota but would you please answer the question which was etc etc"
Read what the guys actually wrote.
|
|
|
Post by ozneil on Sept 10, 2014 20:01:53 GMT -1
Re Oz's post, I'm sure a quick trawl of the internet will find all sorts of theories and hatred stoking messages. Immigration - shudder. Muslim - eek! Prisoners - scary. Controls - no!! gees mini stop trying to wind me up I know you cannot be that PC and naive
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Sept 10, 2014 20:34:55 GMT -1
gee Nota so in the question I pasted the writers spelled Qatar incorrectly whooopydoo When I read the question alarm bells rang... Its a typical "courtroom" "trap" question so I re-read it several times but Nota galloped in with his little red flag flying to show how silly the question was or how clever he was take your pick. Whoever wrote that question knew exactly what he wanted from the questionee. Whether he got it or not I "dinna ken" If it had been done in court I can just see my favourite barrister (advocate) standing up at his lectern adjusting his wig looking at his notes then saying in a slow very pleasant drewl. "That was very interesting Mr Nota but would you please answer the question which was etc etc" Read what the guys actually wrote. I've indulged you and read it again, its still complete tripe One doesn't need a wee red flag ( whatever ra fuck that has to do with it anyways) to realise this is complete shite, one only needs an IQ in double figures at a minimum to realise that. Have you looked up the that Eurabia nonsense yet, its right up there with reds under the bed, queenie is a lizard, Iraqi WMDs really exist, completely loonie conspiracy theories. As for the spelling mistake, its quite common with these right wing loonie conspiracy theories for the originator( and anyone who remotely believes it) to be a wee bit on the thick side. Hence its one of the irst things I look for when dismantling such as this from tinternet. Many years ago, I read the protocols of the elders of Zion, despite being touted as a work of historical fact, it was easy to spot it was written by a right wing intellectual retard who would struggle with to achieve the sentient level of a dog turd. P.S - there's not one actual true fact in that pish, apart from swinneys name, someone must have shown the imbecile responsible how to cut n paste
|
|
|
Post by minime on Sept 11, 2014 6:14:51 GMT -1
Re Oz's post, I'm sure a quick trawl of the internet will find all sorts of theories and hatred stoking messages. Immigration - shudder. Muslim - eek! Prisoners - scary. Controls - no!! gees mini stop trying to wind me up I know you cannot be that PC and naive I'm not trying to wind you up. If you let what I say wind you up then that's for you to deal with. I'm not sure what PC has to do with this or naivety - it's pretty clear that to me that stuff you quoted was designed to promote fear and an irrational and knee jerk response - not unlike that tripe from the DM that so got to Bormes. I'm just concerned what damage you may have done to that man with your posting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2014 18:37:18 GMT -1
Have to agree with Mini, here, that when we're quoting second hand opinions, it's good to know the source. There's a load of shite on that tinternet, you know. Now keep it civil, if you please, everyone. Everyone has the right to their views. Play the ball, not the man. I thankewe
|
|
|
Post by ozneil on Sept 11, 2014 20:07:42 GMT -1
Have to agree with Mini, here, that when we're quoting second hand opinions, it's good to know the source. There's a load of shite on that tinternet, you know. Now keep it civil, if you please, everyone. Everyone has the right to their views. Play the ball, not the man. I thankewe Interesting that It would appear that now in Scotland personal opinion is no longer valid and opinions can only be accepted from recognised authorities. The source isnt important the content is or do you need someone to tell whether its acceptable or not? The one I quoted was a someones(s) personal opinion, a question asked of a MSP and I thought it very valid. If you hadnt been so quick to search for some stolen umbrage you would have noticed that To make absolutely sure I will ask this personally of the transparent Scottish Government through you Jim Swinney stated the Scottish Government would borrow £2,400,000,000.00 to pay off national debts if AAP can be believed 1. Who is the money being borrowed from? 2. What strings are attached? Nota in all his virulent outbursts neglected to address the above which was the whole point of the post. Source of post Ozneil 07:04 AEST 12sept 2014 (happy?)
|
|
|
Post by bormes on Sept 11, 2014 20:51:16 GMT -1
I think you have a very valid point Oz , a personal opinion is actually what this wee forum is meant to be about? Our experiences in our lives will help us make our opinions, which might well be challenged by the latest whim or politically correct fad that blows in from wherever, however experience tends to be the best teacher in my opinion!! I see constant questions about where people demand proof of this or that, when it is only an opinion. Much like my opinion that islam is in the dark ages and it treats women like a chattel, it allows children to be shagged by old men in a marriage, yet my opinion is constantly derided by the odd old maid who parachutes in only to cause discord and may I say to you rolo, the civility you show this fuckwit is remarkable, she should stay in the old wives club as she is just a joke on here!! LOL.
|
|
|
Post by ozneil on Sept 11, 2014 20:57:41 GMT -1
gees mini stop trying to wind me up I know you cannot be that PC and naive I'm not trying to wind you up. If you let what I say wind you up then that's for you to deal with. Sorry Mini I just couldnt believe you were serious
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Sept 11, 2014 21:07:26 GMT -1
Have to agree with Mini, here, that when we're quoting second hand opinions, it's good to know the source. There's a load of shite on that tinternet, you know. Now keep it civil, if you please, everyone. Everyone has the right to their views. Play the ball, not the man. I thankewe Interesting that It would appear that now in Scotland personal opinion is no longer valid and opinions can only be accepted from recognised authorities. The source isnt important the content is or do you need someone to tell whether its acceptable or not? The one I quoted was a someones(s) personal opinion, a question asked of a MSP and I thought it very valid. If you hadnt been so quick to search for some stolen umbrage you would have noticed that To make absolutely sure I will ask this personally of the transparent Scottish Government through you Jim Swinney stated the Scottish Government would borrow £2,400,000,000.00 to pay off national debts if AAP can be believed 1. Who is the money being borrowed from? 2. What strings are attached? Nota in all his virulent outbursts neglected to address the above which was the whole point of the post. Source of post Ozneil 07:04 AEST 12sept 2014 (happy?) That wee pile of pish you posted about Eurabia, swinney, "quatar" is NOT TRUE, its quitte an easy concept to grasp, why do you appear to be struggling with that? Most, if not all countries borrow money via the international markets, seemingly its quite a common occurrence, does Australia not borrow money? Now if Australia borrows money, can you list exactly, every single source of that money? Right down to the last dollar, after all if you expect us to provide you with information on something that may or may not happen, then it must be easy-peasy for you to provide the information requested on something that Australia is actually doing right now One other thing that might amaze you, is that in may 2016, there's a Scottish General Election, now here's the possible hard bit to grasp, the SNP may not be elected as the government, which funnily enough is a feature of such elections.
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Sept 11, 2014 21:19:46 GMT -1
PS Here's a wee link showing the extent of Oz's debt apparently, that should help you in letting us know exactly where it all comes from www.australiandebtclock.com.au/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2014 23:01:28 GMT -1
Interesting that It would appear that now in Scotland personal opinion is no longer valid and opinions can only be accepted from recognised authorities. The source isnt important the content is or do you need someone to tell whether its acceptable or not? The one I quoted was a someones(s) personal opinion, a question asked of a MSP and I thought it very valid. If you hadnt been so quick to search for some stolen umbrage you would have noticed that To make absolutely sure I will ask this personally of the transparent Scottish Government through you Jim Swinney stated the Scottish Government would borrow £2,400,000,000.00 to pay off national debts if AAP can be believed 1. Who is the money being borrowed from? 2. What strings are attached? Nota in all his virulent outbursts neglected to address the above which was the whole point of the post. Source of post Ozneil 07:04 AEST 12sept 2014 (happy?) Now you're just toying with me, Oz Personal opinions are what this forum's aboot! However when quoting "sources" in big serious "quotes" as if to back up your case, it's just good to know if it's just some random view chosen off the tinternet that happens to agree with one's own---or-----some kind of quote from someone that knows a bit about the subject. Now, did you have a question about John Swinney? Or would you prefer a response to the policies of Jim Swinney, who may or may not be a fiction of tinternet?
|
|