|
Post by notanimby on Feb 20, 2012 8:23:29 GMT -1
Do you not think this referendum is important then Mini? It's unbelievably important. funny that you cant provide any information to backk up yer assertion that scotland is better off in the union - no doubt a lying fukker like you could come up with some pish BUT THEN AGAIN ONCE A LIAR ALWAYS A LIAR
|
|
|
Post by bormes on Feb 20, 2012 16:17:32 GMT -1
One thing I can say is that Alex Salmond is totally for making Scotland a much better place to live in, now regardless which side anyone takes SNP or Unionist, he and the SNP have done more for Scotland and have had countries all around the world, particularly in Europe, listening and mainly supportive of the SNP stance. ( I wonder why, when the media is so against us and most of Europe have access to BBC?)
Labour in particular have had Scots support them for years, almost traditionally, yet their hatred for the SNP shows constantly, (like the BBC) Even Mr Cameron is trying to bribe the Scottish people suggesting he would give us more power if we do not vote for separation. Well why wait? Give it now, tell us why it has not already been offered?
Recently a UK Gov., sponsered RC crowd went to visit the Pope in the Vatican on an official visit, funnily enough, the head of the RC Church in the UK was NOT invited along on this wee jolly. Now that is very strange, perhaps, until one remembers that the head of the RC Church in the UK happens to be in SCOTLAND !! Do the unionists on our forum think that was an accident? A mistake? Or actually a snub to the Scots, or to RC'S ? I think it was a deliberate snub, English Church people go but not the head of the RC Church for the UK, yet the head of the English branch of the sect goes? More Whitehall lack of manners.
|
|
|
Post by westender on Feb 21, 2012 18:04:57 GMT -1
I don't see our position as being run by another country Then you are completely ill- or under-informed.
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Feb 22, 2012 19:35:52 GMT -1
I don't see our position as being run by another country Then you are completely ill- or under-informed. He's a lyin fukker - he wont answer any questions asked about his assertions - typical of fukwits like this wanker
|
|
|
Post by westender on Feb 22, 2012 20:09:06 GMT -1
Now now, play nice. We're all only here for the banter.
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Feb 23, 2012 8:44:53 GMT -1
Now now, play nice. We're all only here for the banter. Indeed - its the lack of it frae that erse that's the problem though
|
|
|
Post by minime on Feb 23, 2012 16:13:17 GMT -1
I don't see our position as being run by another country Then you are completely ill- or under-informed. I disagree with that. I've reached my own opinion and any other right thinking, intelligent person would blah blah blah - decided not to use that tack
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Feb 23, 2012 16:20:23 GMT -1
Then you are completely ill- or under-informed. I disagree with that. I've reached my own opinion and any other right thinking, intelligent person would blah blah blah - decided not to use that tack have you really numbnuts - funny how you can't answer any questions asked of your er er "opinion/assertion" - usually the mark of a fukwitted liar
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2012 22:39:33 GMT -1
So all three Unionist parties appear to be in considerable disarray again today at their party conferences. Repeated calls (it's getting boring now) to override the Scottish government's clearly laid-out timing, as outlined in the manifesto that saw the SNP's landslide and bring the referendum forward. The SNP's current priority's working towards overturning the Labour majorities in the Council elections in May. You wonder whether the Unionists believe applying pressure for an early referendum's going to change that, or something? Prime Minister David Cameron told the Conservative Party's spring conference yesterday that the United Kingdom was stronger together and he would not give up on keeping it united "without the fight of my life". HAH! Since WHEN precisely, did any Tory have any interest in the welfare of the Scottish people other than to ungratefully receive our contribution to the tax coffers? Oddly enough, he---like his compadres Ed Milliband and Nick Clegg--have yet to admit the fact that Scotland pays in more to the UKE coffers than it takes out. I'd seem their collective 'best shot's to insist we're too small and too insignificant to go it alone. No concrete reasons or evidence given. No inspiration, no ideas and no positive reasons to vote for them. Post May-election they won't know what's hit them. That's what they're so terrified of. That, plus the fact that even if the Scots accept one tenth of the national debt, we'll also claim one tenth of the UKE national assets. That'll be interesting. And while money's important, it's not the be all and end all. What we want is the ability to spend what we have in the ways that we want, not dictated by others' priorities-- but our own.
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Mar 5, 2012 8:29:45 GMT -1
Funny how that at the conferences, both the SCUM party and the LIE-DUMBS made great play of working with all pro- unionist parties and like minded folks
I await with baited breath them sharing a platform with the Orange Lodge, the BNP and the National Front - I would pay good money to attend such a meeting
|
|
|
Post by bormes on Mar 5, 2012 8:56:54 GMT -1
On Sunday the BBC female reporter had Nick Clegg waffling on and on and on and he was just not up to answering her questions. He floundered and spluttered like a wee boy getting a row from the teacher. I have yet to hear from anyone the actual benefits Scotland would have by remaining in this one sided union.
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Mar 5, 2012 9:35:28 GMT -1
On Sunday the BBC female reporter had Nick Clegg waffling on and on and on and he was just not up to answering her questions. He floundered and spluttered like a wee boy getting a row from the teacher. I have yet to hear from anyone the actual benefits Scotland would have by remaining in this one sided union.Apparently they are beyond counting, an infinite number -thats why they can't mention them, in case mentioning one puts the other benefits noses out of joint
|
|
|
Post by celyn on Mar 5, 2012 14:32:50 GMT -1
I suppose it's a bit like the infinite number of monkeys writing Shakespeare with their infinite number of typewriters. It's possible, although a bit unlikely.
And now apparently Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling are gonnae tell us all why the union is so good. That would be because they are so very expert in everything they do and because everyone trusts them so much. Or maybe not.
|
|
|
Post by notanimby on Mar 5, 2012 15:26:04 GMT -1
I suppose it's a bit like the infinite number of monkeys writing Shakespeare with their infinite number of typewriters. It's possible, although a bit unlikely. And now apparently Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling are gonnae tell us all why the union is so good. That would be because they are so very expert in everything they do and because everyone trusts them so much. Or maybe not. Indeed Celyn - I'm just surprised - nae flabbergasted - that they aren't wheeling out Bliar, after all he's done such a wonderful job of being Middle East Peace Envoy, this should be a piece of pish for him to sort
|
|
|
Post by bormes on Mar 5, 2012 16:52:40 GMT -1
Don't forget the job he did for NI too, I mean it's all peace and love over there eh?
|
|